For some of us, the less said about the way we do things the better.

Pain is filtered in a poem so that it becomes finally, in the end, pleasure.

The future is always beginning now.

A great many people seem to think writing poetry is worthwhile, even though it pays next to nothing and is not as widely read as it should be.

A life is not sufficiently elevated for poetry, unless, of course, the life has been made into an art.

And at least in poetry you should feel free to lie. That is, not to lie, but to imagine what you want, to follow the direction of the poem.

But I tend to think of the expressive part of me as rather tedious - never curious or responsive, but blind and self-serving.

Each moment is a place you've never been.

From the reader's view, a poem is more demanding than prose.

I am not concerned with truth, nor with conventional notions of what is beautiful.

I tend to like poems that engage me - that is to say, which do not bore me.

I would say that American poetry has always been a poetry of personal testimony.

It's very hard to write humor.

Nothing is the destiny of everyone, it is our commonness made dumb.

Poetry is something that happens in universities, in creative writing programs or in English departments.

Poetry is, first and last, language - the rest is filler.

The number of people writing poems is vast, and their reasons for doing so are many, that much can be surmised from the stacks of submissions.

There's a certain point, when you're writing autobiographical stuff, where you don't want to misrepresent yourself. It would be dishonest.

Usually a life turned into a poem is misrepresented.

And Robert Lowell, of course - in his poems, we're not located in his actual life. We're located more in the externals, in the journalistic facts of his life.